<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>/dev/null &#187; FrOSCon</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nulldevice.de/tag/froscon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nulldevice.de</link>
	<description>Static is evil.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 17:28:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>FrOSCon not relevant?</title>
		<link>http://www.nulldevice.de/2010/08/froscon-not-relevant/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nulldevice.de/2010/08/froscon-not-relevant/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Aug 2010 20:49:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrOSCon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nulldevice.de/?p=1191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The hobby experts on Wikipedia say that FrOSCon is not relevant: Keine Relevanz [...] ersichtlich. Die Fotos lassen auf eine eher familiäre Veranstaltung schliessen. Well, I havent looked at it this way so far. FrOSCon is not exactly a small &#8220;family event&#8221;&#8230; the discussion was a good laugh before going to bed]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The hobby experts on Wikipedia say that FrOSCon is <a href="http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:L%C3%B6schkandidaten/24._August_2010#FrOSCon">not relevant</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Keine Relevanz [...] ersichtlich. Die Fotos lassen auf eine eher familiäre Veranstaltung schliessen.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, I havent looked at it this way so far. FrOSCon is not exactly a small &#8220;family event&#8221;&#8230; the discussion was a good laugh before going to bed <img src='http://www.nulldevice.de/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nulldevice.de/2010/08/froscon-not-relevant/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Simple is hard</title>
		<link>http://www.nulldevice.de/2008/09/simple-is-hard/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nulldevice.de/2008/09/simple-is-hard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[PHP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FrOSCon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rasmus Lerdorf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nulldevice.de/?p=879</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Check out these slides by Rasmus Lerdorf presented at FrOSCon 2008: http://talks.php.net/show/froscon08 Yes, PHP frameworks do suck in terms of performance. CakePHP is the slowest while Zend Framework seems to be the most complex, in terms of include dependencies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out these slides by Rasmus Lerdorf presented at FrOSCon 2008:</p>
<p><a href="http://talks.php.net/show/froscon08">http://talks.php.net/show/froscon08</a></p>
<p>Yes, PHP frameworks do suck in terms of performance. CakePHP is the slowest while Zend Framework seems to be the most complex, in terms of include dependencies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nulldevice.de/2008/09/simple-is-hard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

